Franchise Decision Radar

Residential cleaning franchises: 7 brands compared from regulator-filed FDDs

Side-by-side fee burden, startup cost, and system health for major residential cleaning franchises — built from 2025 FDDs filed with the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions.

7
Brands analyzed from
regulator-filed FDDs
$92K–$218K
Initial investment range
across the category
$42,000
Annual fee burden spread
at $300K revenue
35–802
Franchised outlets
smallest to largest

The Brands

Brand Outlets Investment Annual Fees at $300K Notable
Merry Maids 802 $126K–$170K $32,988 (11.0%) Largest system, lowest fees Review →
Molly Maid 448 $139K–$197K $31,056 (10.4%) Best tiered royalty at scale Review →
The Cleaning Authority 233 $92K–$147K $22,902 (7.6%) Only growing large brand Review →
The Maids 338 $117K–$141K $59,130 (19.7%) Company-owned P&L disclosed Review →
MaidPro 237 $109K–$158K $30,000 (10.0%) Simplest fee structure Review →
Two Maids & A Mop 144 $93K–$149K $64,800 (21.6%) Fastest growth (+57%) Review →
Maid Right 35 $147K–$218K $50,780 (16.9%) Highest recurring revenue % Review →

Annual fees Modeled at $300K gross revenue, Year 5, single territory.

What Separates These Brands

Residential cleaning has the widest performance spread of any category on the site. The two largest systems — Merry Maids (1,400+ outlets) and Molly Maid (500+ outlets) — are both contracting, losing franchised units in each of the last three reporting years. Meanwhile, The Cleaning Authority and Two Maids are the only brands posting consistent net growth, with Two Maids growing 57% over three years.

This is also the strongest category for Item 19 disclosure. All seven brands provide some form of financial performance representation, though the depth varies considerably. The Cleaning Authority reports average unit revenue and COGS ratios. The Maids discloses company-owned P&L data. Others provide revenue distributions or medians. No other category on the site offers this level of financial disclosure across the board.

Fee structures are more varied here than in mosquito control or lawn care. Merry Maids pairs the largest system with the lowest total fees. Molly Maid offers a tiered royalty that rewards scale. MaidPro has the simplest structure — flat royalty, no technology surcharges, no call center fees. A buyer’s fee exposure depends heavily on which combination of royalty, marketing, and technology fees a given brand mandates.

Three Ways to Compare

Fee Burden →
The most varied fee structures of any category. Royalty rates, marketing minimums, and technology surcharges combine differently across seven brands. The fee burden comparison models total ongoing costs at four revenue levels.
System Health →
A category split between legacy contraction and newcomer growth. The system health comparison shows which brands are gaining outlets, which are losing them, and how fast.
Cost to Enter →
Investment ranges span from under $100K to over $200K, with significant variation in what’s included. The cost comparison breaks down initial fees, equipment, marketing, and reserves.
Going deeper on one brand? 7 Decision Reports available in this category. View reports — $99 / brand →

All data extracted from 2025 Franchise Disclosure Documents filed with the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions. Modeled values use explicitly documented assumptions. Read our methodology →